Archambault A40RC vs Landfall 39
How do the Archambault A40RC and Landfall 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A40RC Archambault Boats · 2003 Landfall 39 Sino American Yacht Industrial Company · 1974 | Archambault A40RC | Landfall 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.3 ft11.98 m | 39.2 ft11.94 m |
| Waterline length | 34.6 ft10.54 m | 30.6 ft9.32 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.75 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 8.1 ft2.48 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 14,661 lb6,650 kg | 23,500 lb10,659 kg |
| Ballast | 6,834 lb3,100 kg | 8,800 lb3,992 kg |
| Sail area | 980 ft²91.0 m² | 811 ft²75.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.18 | 15.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 158 | 367 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 42.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 7.4 |
Archambault A40RC vs Landfall 39: the short version
- The Archambault A40RC and Landfall 39 are close in length (39.3 ft11.98 m vs 39.2 ft11.94 m ).
- The Landfall 39 is heavier, displacing about 60% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A40RC carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Landfall 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Landfall 39 rates better for offshore work (1.61 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.