Archambault Bagheera vs Corinthian 19
How do the Archambault Bagheera and Corinthian 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Bagheera | Archambault Bagheera | Corinthian 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.5 ft5.94 m |
| Waterline length | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Beam | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.95 m | 2.8 ft0.84 m |
| Displacement | 882 lb400 kg | 2,724 lb1,236 kg |
| Ballast | 463 lb210 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 184 ft²17.1 m² | 193 ft²17.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.01 | 15.83 |
| Displacement / Length | 104 | 399 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.6 | 21.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.1 |
Archambault Bagheera vs Corinthian 19: the short version
- The Archambault Bagheera and Corinthian 19 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.5 ft5.94 m ).
- The Corinthian 19 is heavier, displacing about 209% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Bagheera carries the more powerful rig (32.0 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Corinthian 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corinthian 19 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.