Archambault Bagheera vs Halman 20
How do the Archambault Bagheera and Halman 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Bagheera 
Halman 20 | Archambault Bagheera | Halman 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 17.1 ft5.21 m |
| Beam | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.95 m | 2.8 ft0.86 m |
| Displacement | 882 lb400 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Ballast | 463 lb210 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 184 ft²17.1 m² | 179 ft²16.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.01 | 15.55 |
| Displacement / Length | 104 | 224 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.6 | 14.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.5 |
Archambault Bagheera vs Halman 20: the short version
- The Archambault Bagheera and Halman 20 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Halman 20 is heavier, displacing about 183% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Bagheera carries the more powerful rig (32.0 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Halman 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Halman 20 rates better for offshore work (2.28 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.