Archambault Bagheera vs Havsfidra
How do the Archambault Bagheera and Havsfidra compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Bagheera | Archambault Bagheera | Havsfidra | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Beam | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.95 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 882 lb400 kg | 3,307 lb1,500 kg |
| Ballast | 463 lb210 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Sail area | 184 ft²17.1 m² | 183 ft²17.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.01 | 13.19 |
| Displacement / Length | 104 | 335 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.6 | 21.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 1.94 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Average used price | — | €1,500 |
Archambault Bagheera vs Havsfidra: the short version
- The Archambault Bagheera and Havsfidra are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Havsfidra is heavier, displacing about 275% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Bagheera carries the more powerful rig (32.0 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Havsfidra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Havsfidra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.