Archambault Bagheera vs Kelt 550
How do the Archambault Bagheera and Kelt 550 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Bagheera 
Kelt 550 | Archambault Bagheera | Kelt 550 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.6 ft5.97 m |
| Waterline length | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 17.2 ft5.25 m |
| Beam | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.95 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 882 lb400 kg | 1,190 lb540 kg |
| Ballast | 463 lb210 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 184 ft²17.1 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 32.01 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 104 | 104 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.6 | 6.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 3.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 5.6 |
Archambault Bagheera vs Kelt 550: the short version
- The Archambault Bagheera and Kelt 550 are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.6 ft5.97 m ).
- The Kelt 550 is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Archambault Bagheera scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault Bagheera rates better for offshore work (2.47 vs 3.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.