Archambault Bagheera vs Triss Magnum
How do the Archambault Bagheera and Triss Magnum compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Bagheera | Archambault Bagheera | Triss Magnum | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Beam | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 7.9 ft2.40 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.95 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 882 lb400 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | 463 lb210 kg | 1,235 lb560 kg |
| Sail area | 184 ft²17.1 m² | 248 ft²23.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.01 | 21.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 104 | 3007 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.6 | 22.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 3.6 |
| Average used price | — | €1,000 |
Archambault Bagheera vs Triss Magnum: the short version
- The Archambault Bagheera and Triss Magnum are close in length (19.7 ft6.00 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Triss Magnum is heavier, displacing about 187% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Bagheera carries the more powerful rig (32.0 vs 21.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Triss Magnum scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Triss Magnum rates better for offshore work (2.31 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.