Archambault Coco vs Dovekie 21
How do the Archambault Coco and Dovekie 21 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Coco | Archambault Coco | Dovekie 21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.4 ft6.53 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.36 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 2,535 lb1,150 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Ballast | 992 lb450 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 143 ft²13.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.53 | 32.16 |
| Displacement / Length | 134 | 39 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.4 | 3.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 3.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.8 |
Archambault Coco vs Dovekie 21: the short version
- The Archambault Coco and Dovekie 21 are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.4 ft6.53 m ).
- The Archambault Coco is heavier, displacing about 323% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Dovekie 21 carries the more powerful rig (32.2 vs 24.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault Coco scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault Coco rates better for offshore work (2.60 vs 3.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.