Archambault Coco vs Junker 22
How do the Archambault Coco and Junker 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Coco | Archambault Coco | Junker 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 18.0 ft5.50 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.36 m | —— |
| Displacement | 2,535 lb1,150 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Ballast | 992 lb450 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 205 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.53 | 16.26 |
| Displacement / Length | 134 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.4 | 19.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.7 |
| Average used price | — | €1,500 |
Archambault Coco vs Junker 22: the short version
- The Archambault Coco and Junker 22 are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- The Junker 22 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Coco carries the more powerful rig (24.5 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Junker 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Junker 22 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.