Archambault Grand Surprise vs Marieholm 32 / 32E
How do the Archambault Grand Surprise and Marieholm 32 / 32E compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Grand Surprise 
Marieholm 32 / 32E | Archambault Grand Surprise | Marieholm 32 / 32E | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.3 ft9.54 m | 31.4 ft9.56 m |
| Waterline length | 29.3 ft8.93 m | 23.9 ft7.30 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.05 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 58 lb26 kg | 7,716 lb3,500 kg |
| Ballast | 2,315 lb1,050 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Sail area | 602 ft²55.9 m² | 479 ft²44.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 642.83 | 19.63 |
| Displacement / Length | 1 | 251 |
| Comfort ratio | 0.1 | 21.7 |
| Capsize screening | 10.11 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | — | €24,000 |
Archambault Grand Surprise vs Marieholm 32 / 32E: the short version
- The Archambault Grand Surprise and Marieholm 32 / 32E are close in length (31.3 ft9.54 m vs 31.4 ft9.56 m ).
- The Marieholm 32 / 32E is heavier, displacing about 13203% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Grand Surprise carries the more powerful rig (642.8 vs 19.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marieholm 32 / 32E scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm 32 / 32E rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 10.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.