Arco 33 vs Newport 33
How do the Arco 33 and Newport 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Arco 33 | Arco 33 | Newport 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.09 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.2 ft1.58 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 550 ft²51.1 m² | 465 ft²43.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.79 | 16.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 426 | 215 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.8 | 21.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Arco 33 vs Newport 33: the short version
- The Arco 33 and Newport 33 are close in length (33.0 ft10.06 m vs 33.0 ft10.06 m ).
- The Arco 33 is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Arco 33 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 16.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Arco 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Arco 33 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.