Arco 33 vs Nova 33
How do the Arco 33 and Nova 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Arco 33 
Nova 33 | Arco 33 | Nova 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.0 ft10.06 m | 33.0 ft10.06 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.09 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 8,177 lb3,709 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,868 lb1,754 kg |
| Sail area | 550 ft²51.1 m² | 493 ft²45.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.79 | 19.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 426 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.8 | 19.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.72 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.9 |
Arco 33 vs Nova 33: the short version
- The Arco 33 and Nova 33 are close in length (33.0 ft10.06 m vs 33.0 ft10.06 m ).
- The Arco 33 is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nova 33 carries the more powerful rig (19.4 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Arco 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Arco 33 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.