Atlantic City catboat vs Captiva 240
How do the Atlantic City catboat and Captiva 240 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Atlantic City catboat | Atlantic City catboat | Captiva 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 2,200 lb998 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 452 ft²42.0 m² | 280 ft²26.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.08 | 24.99 |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.4 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 2.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.0 |
Atlantic City catboat vs Captiva 240: the short version
- The Atlantic City catboat and Captiva 240 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Atlantic City catboat is heavier, displacing about 233% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Captiva 240 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 18.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Atlantic City catboat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Atlantic City catboat rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.