Atoll vs Beetle Cat
How do the Atoll and Beetle Cat compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Atoll 
Beetle Cat | Atoll | Beetle Cat | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.3 ft3.75 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.64 m | 6.1 ft1.85 m |
| Draft | —— | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 40 lb18 kg | 450 lb204 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 140 ft²13.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 38.15 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 126 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 5.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 3.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.6 |
Atoll vs Beetle Cat: the short version
- The Atoll and Beetle Cat are close in length (12.3 ft3.75 m vs 12.3 ft3.76 m ).
- The Beetle Cat is heavier, displacing about 1025% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Atoll rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.