Atoll vs Widgeon 12
How do the Atoll and Widgeon 12 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Atoll | Atoll | Widgeon 12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.3 ft3.75 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Beam | 2.1 ft0.64 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 40 lb18 kg | 180 lb82 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | 90 ft²8.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 45.17 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 47 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 2.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 3.54 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.6 |
Atoll vs Widgeon 12: the short version
- The Atoll and Widgeon 12 are close in length (12.3 ft3.75 m vs 12.3 ft3.76 m ).
- The Widgeon 12 is heavier, displacing about 350% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Atoll rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.54).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.