Avance 24 vs MacGregor 24
How do the Avance 24 and MacGregor 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Avance 24 
MacGregor 24 | Avance 24 | MacGregor 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.6 ft7.50 m | 24.6 ft7.49 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 4,189 lb1,900 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 575 lb261 kg |
| Sail area | 323 ft²30.0 m² | 231 ft²21.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.89 | 22.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 245 | 97 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.2 | 9.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 2.47 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.2 |
| Average used price | €4,000 | — |
Avance 24 vs MacGregor 24: the short version
- The Avance 24 and MacGregor 24 are close in length (24.6 ft7.50 m vs 24.6 ft7.49 m ).
- The Avance 24 is heavier, displacing about 99% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the MacGregor 24 carries the more powerful rig (22.5 vs 19.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Avance 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Avance 24 rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.