B Boats B-32 vs Contest 32 CS
How do the B Boats B-32 and Contest 32 CS compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
B Boats B-32 
Contest 32 CS | B Boats B-32 | Contest 32 CS | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 31.8 ft9.70 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 25.7 ft7.82 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 10.9 ft3.32 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.96 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 4,100 lb1,860 kg | 14,300 lb6,486 kg |
| Ballast | 1,650 lb748 kg | 6,380 lb2,894 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 289 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 31.23 | 7.85 |
| Displacement / Length | 88 | 378 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.8 | 33.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.58 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 6.8 |
B Boats B-32 vs Contest 32 CS: the short version
- The B Boats B-32 and Contest 32 CS are close in length (32.0 ft9.75 m vs 31.8 ft9.70 m ).
- The Contest 32 CS is heavier, displacing about 249% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the B Boats B-32 carries the more powerful rig (31.2 vs 7.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Contest 32 CS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Contest 32 CS rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 2.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.