B Boats B-32 vs Dione 98
How do the B Boats B-32 and Dione 98 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
B Boats B-32 
Dione 98 | B Boats B-32 | Dione 98 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 23.8 ft7.26 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 10.3 ft3.13 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.96 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 4,100 lb1,860 kg | 6,834 lb3,100 kg |
| Ballast | 1,650 lb748 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 394 ft²36.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 31.23 | 17.51 |
| Displacement / Length | 88 | 226 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.8 | 18.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.58 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 6.5 |
B Boats B-32 vs Dione 98: the short version
- The B Boats B-32 and Dione 98 are close in length (32.0 ft9.75 m vs 32.0 ft9.75 m ).
- The Dione 98 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the B Boats B-32 carries the more powerful rig (31.2 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Dione 98 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Dione 98 rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.