B Boats B-32 vs Hunter 32 Vision
How do the B Boats B-32 and Hunter 32 Vision compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
B Boats B-32 
Hunter 32 Vision | B Boats B-32 | Hunter 32 Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Waterline length | 27.5 ft8.38 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 6.4 ft1.96 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 4,100 lb1,860 kg | 11,400 lb5,171 kg |
| Ballast | 1,650 lb748 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Sail area | 500 ft²46.5 m² | 486 ft²45.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 31.23 | 15.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 88 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.8 | 24.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.58 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
B Boats B-32 vs Hunter 32 Vision: the short version
- The B Boats B-32 and Hunter 32 Vision are close in length (32.0 ft9.75 m vs 32.0 ft9.75 m ).
- The Hunter 32 Vision is heavier, displacing about 178% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the B Boats B-32 carries the more powerful rig (31.2 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 32 Vision scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 32 Vision rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.