Baby Cat vs Crit 245
How do the Baby Cat and Crit 245 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Baby Cat | Baby Cat | Crit 245 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.4 ft2.55 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.6 ft0.80 m | 1.8 ft0.55 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 49 lb22 kg | 18 lb8 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.86 | 2.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Baby Cat vs Crit 245: the short version
- The Baby Cat and Crit 245 are close in length (8.4 ft2.55 m vs 8.0 ft2.45 m ).
- The Baby Cat is heavier, displacing about 172% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Crit 245 rates better for offshore work (2.75 vs 2.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.