Baby Cat vs Le 260
How do the Baby Cat and Le 260 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Baby Cat | Baby Cat | Le 260 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.4 ft2.55 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.6 ft0.80 m | 1.6 ft0.50 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 49 lb22 kg | 13 lb6 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.86 | 2.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Baby Cat vs Le 260: the short version
- The Baby Cat and Le 260 are close in length (8.4 ft2.55 m vs 8.5 ft2.60 m ).
- The Baby Cat is heavier, displacing about 277% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Le 260 rates better for offshore work (2.79 vs 2.86).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.