Bahama 30 vs C&C Mega 30 One Design
How do the Bahama 30 and C&C Mega 30 One Design compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Bahama 30 | C&C Mega 30 One Design | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 24.6 ft7.49 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 8,230 lb3,733 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 3,130 lb1,420 kg | 2,250 lb1,021 kg |
| Sail area | 450 ft²41.8 m² | 428 ft²39.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.66 | 25.12 |
| Displacement / Length | 247 | 98 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.6 | 15.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.98 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.0 |
Bahama 30 vs C&C Mega 30 One Design: the short version
- The Bahama 30 and C&C Mega 30 One Design are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.9 ft9.12 m ).
- The Bahama 30 is heavier, displacing about 83% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C Mega 30 One Design carries the more powerful rig (25.1 vs 17.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bahama 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Mega 30 One Design rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
C&C Mega 30 One Design