Bahama 30 vs Semona 30
How do the Bahama 30 and Semona 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bahama 30 | Bahama 30 | Semona 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.9 ft9.10 m |
| Waterline length | 24.6 ft7.49 m | 23.0 ft7.00 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 9.7 ft2.95 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 8,230 lb3,733 kg | 7,055 lb3,200 kg |
| Ballast | 3,130 lb1,420 kg | 3,307 lb1,500 kg |
| Sail area | 450 ft²41.8 m² | 344 ft²32.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.66 | 14.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 247 | 260 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.6 | 21.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.98 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | — | €3,900 |
Bahama 30 vs Semona 30: the short version
- The Bahama 30 and Semona 30 are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.9 ft9.10 m ).
- The Bahama 30 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bahama 30 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bahama 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bahama 30 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.