Balboa 16 vs Laguna 16
How do the Balboa 16 and Laguna 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Balboa 16 | Balboa 16 | Laguna 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Waterline length | 14.7 ft4.47 m | 14.7 ft4.47 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.29 m | 7.4 ft2.26 m |
| Draft | 2.4 ft0.74 m | 2.4 ft0.74 m |
| Displacement | 1,000 lb454 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Ballast | 400 lb181 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 117 ft²10.9 m² | 117 ft²10.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.72 | 18.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 141 | 141 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.0 | 7.1 |
| Capsize screening | 3.00 | 2.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Balboa 16 vs Laguna 16: the short version
- The Balboa 16 and Laguna 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 16.0 ft4.88 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Laguna 16 carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 18.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Laguna 16 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Laguna 16 rates better for offshore work (2.97 vs 3.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.