Balboa 20 vs C-Scow
How do the Balboa 20 and C-Scow compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Balboa 20 | Balboa 20 | C-Scow | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | —— |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 3.3 ft1.01 m |
| Displacement | 1,700 lb771 kg | 650 lb295 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 182 ft²16.9 m² | 216 ft²20.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.44 | 46.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 142 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.37 | 3.23 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | — |
Balboa 20 vs C-Scow: the short version
- The Balboa 20 and C-Scow are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Balboa 20 is heavier, displacing about 162% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C-Scow carries the more powerful rig (46.1 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Balboa 20 rates better for offshore work (2.37 vs 3.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.