Balboa 20 vs Flying Dutchman
How do the Balboa 20 and Flying Dutchman compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Balboa 20 
Flying Dutchman | Balboa 20 | Flying Dutchman | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.9 ft6.06 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 18.0 ft5.50 m |
| Beam | 7.1 ft2.16 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Draft | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 1,700 lb771 kg | 364 lb165 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 182 ft²16.9 m² | 183 ft²17.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.44 | 57.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 142 | 28 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.6 | 2.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.37 | 3.27 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.7 |
Balboa 20 vs Flying Dutchman: the short version
- The Balboa 20 and Flying Dutchman are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 19.9 ft6.06 m ).
- The Balboa 20 is heavier, displacing about 367% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Dutchman carries the more powerful rig (57.4 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Balboa 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Balboa 20 rates better for offshore work (2.37 vs 3.27).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.