Balboa 22 vs Fabola Campus 650
How do the Balboa 22 and Fabola Campus 650 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Balboa 22 | Balboa 22 | Fabola Campus 650 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.6 ft6.58 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 0.6 ft0.18 m |
| Displacement | 1,980 lb898 kg | 1,279 lb580 kg |
| Ballast | 600 lb272 kg | 132 lb60 kg |
| Sail area | 206 ft²19.1 m² | 248 ft²23.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.90 | 33.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 129 | 68 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.7 | 6.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.55 | 2.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €5,700 |
Balboa 22 vs Fabola Campus 650: the short version
- The Balboa 22 and Fabola Campus 650 are close in length (21.6 ft6.58 m vs 21.6 ft6.60 m ).
- The Balboa 22 is heavier, displacing about 55% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Fabola Campus 650 carries the more powerful rig (33.7 vs 20.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Balboa 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Balboa 22 rates better for offshore work (2.55 vs 2.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.