Balboa 24 vs Buccaneer 240
How do the Balboa 24 and Buccaneer 240 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Balboa 24 | Balboa 24 | Buccaneer 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.6 ft7.19 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 2,600 lb1,179 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Sail area | 221 ft²20.5 m² | 220 ft²20.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.70 | 13.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 145 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.3 | 18.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Balboa 24 vs Buccaneer 240: the short version
- The Balboa 24 and Buccaneer 240 are close in length (23.6 ft7.19 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Buccaneer 240 is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Balboa 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 240 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 240 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.