Ballad 30 vs Semona 30
How do the Ballad 30 and Semona 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Ballad 30 
Semona 30 | Ballad 30 | Semona 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.9 ft9.10 m |
| Waterline length | 22.6 ft6.88 m | 23.0 ft7.00 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.95 m | 9.7 ft2.95 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 7,276 lb3,300 kg | 7,055 lb3,200 kg |
| Ballast | 3,417 lb1,550 kg | 3,307 lb1,500 kg |
| Sail area | 370 ft²34.4 m² | 344 ft²32.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.77 | 14.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 260 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.1 | 21.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | — | €3,900 |
Ballad 30 vs Semona 30: the short version
- The Ballad 30 and Semona 30 are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.9 ft9.10 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Ballad 30 carries the more powerful rig (15.8 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ballad 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ballad 30 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.