Baltic 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend
How do the Baltic 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Baltic 37 | Hunter 37.5 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 27.3 ft8.31 m | 31.8 ft9.68 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 13,600 lb6,169 kg | 16,400 lb7,439 kg |
| Ballast | 6,120 lb2,776 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 640 ft²59.5 m² | 704 ft²65.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.97 | 17.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 300 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.4 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.6 |
Baltic 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend: the short version
- The Baltic 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- The Hunter 37.5 Legend is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Baltic 37 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 37.5 Legend scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 37.5 Legend rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.