Baltic 37 vs Ranger 37
How do the Baltic 37 and Ranger 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Baltic 37 | Baltic 37 | Ranger 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 27.3 ft8.31 m | 28.3 ft8.63 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 13,600 lb6,169 kg | 15,200 lb6,895 kg |
| Ballast | 6,120 lb2,776 kg | 7,300 lb3,311 kg |
| Sail area | 640 ft²59.5 m² | 629 ft²58.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.97 | 16.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 300 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.4 | 30.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.1 |
Baltic 37 vs Ranger 37: the short version
- The Baltic 37 and Ranger 37 are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- The Ranger 37 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Baltic 37 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ranger 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ranger 37 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.