Baltic 37 vs Seidelmann 37
How do the Baltic 37 and Seidelmann 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Baltic 37 | Baltic 37 | Seidelmann 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 36.8 ft11.23 m |
| Waterline length | 27.3 ft8.31 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 13,600 lb6,169 kg | 12,000 lb5,443 kg |
| Ballast | 6,120 lb2,776 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 640 ft²59.5 m² | 643 ft²59.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.97 | 19.63 |
| Displacement / Length | 300 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.4 | 20.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.5 |
Baltic 37 vs Seidelmann 37: the short version
- The Baltic 37 and Seidelmann 37 are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 36.8 ft11.23 m ).
- The Baltic 37 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Seidelmann 37 carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Baltic 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Baltic 37 rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.