Banshee vs RS Aero
How do the Banshee and RS Aero compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Banshee | RS Aero | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 13.0 ft3.96 m | 13.2 ft4.01 m |
| Waterline length | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 13.2 ft4.01 m |
| Beam | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.84 m | 1.0 ft0.30 m |
| Displacement | 115 lb52 kg | 66 lb30 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 88 ft²8.2 m² | 5 ft²0.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 59.54 | 4.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 30 | 13 |
| Comfort ratio | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| Capsize screening | 4.05 | 4.54 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.6 | 4.9 |
Banshee vs RS Aero: the short version
- The Banshee and RS Aero are close in length (13.0 ft3.96 m vs 13.2 ft4.01 m ).
- The Banshee is heavier, displacing about 74% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Banshee carries the more powerful rig (59.5 vs 4.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Banshee scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Banshee rates better for offshore work (4.05 vs 4.54).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Banshee
RS Aero