Barnett 1400 vs Hobie 14
How do the Barnett 1400 and Hobie 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Barnett 1400 
Hobie 14 | Barnett 1400 | Hobie 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 13.9 ft4.25 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 7.6 ft2.31 m |
| Draft | 1.3 ft0.41 m | 0.7 ft0.20 m |
| Displacement | 140 lb64 kg | 240 lb109 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 75 ft²7.0 m² | 148 ft²13.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.51 | 61.32 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.40 | 4.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Barnett 1400 vs Hobie 14: the short version
- The Barnett 1400 and Hobie 14 are close in length (13.8 ft4.22 m vs 13.9 ft4.25 m ).
- The Hobie 14 is heavier, displacing about 71% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hobie 14 carries the more powerful rig (61.3 vs 44.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Barnett 1400 rates better for offshore work (3.40 vs 4.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.