Barnett 1400 vs Laser Vago
How do the Barnett 1400 and Laser Vago compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Barnett 1400 
Laser Vago | Barnett 1400 | Laser Vago | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 13.8 ft4.22 m | 13.8 ft4.20 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 5.1 ft1.56 m |
| Draft | 1.3 ft0.41 m | 3.8 ft1.15 m |
| Displacement | 140 lb64 kg | 234 lb106 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 75 ft²7.0 m² | 139 ft²12.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.51 | 58.57 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.40 | 3.32 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Barnett 1400 vs Laser Vago: the short version
- The Barnett 1400 and Laser Vago are close in length (13.8 ft4.22 m vs 13.8 ft4.20 m ).
- The Laser Vago is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Laser Vago carries the more powerful rig (58.6 vs 44.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Laser Vago rates better for offshore work (3.32 vs 3.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.