Bay Hen 21 vs Buccaneer 210
How do the Bay Hen 21 and Buccaneer 210 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bay Hen 21 | Bay Hen 21 | Buccaneer 210 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.56 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 900 lb408 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 175 ft²16.3 m² | 198 ft²18.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.04 | 15.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 66 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 6.3 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.59 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Bay Hen 21 vs Buccaneer 210: the short version
- The Bay Hen 21 and Buccaneer 210 are close in length (21.0 ft6.40 m vs 20.8 ft6.35 m ).
- The Buccaneer 210 is heavier, displacing about 233% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bay Hen 21 carries the more powerful rig (30.0 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 210 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 210 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.59).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.