Bay Hen 21 vs Hunter 212
How do the Bay Hen 21 and Hunter 212 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bay Hen 21 | Bay Hen 21 | Hunter 212 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.56 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 6.3 ft1.91 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 900 lb408 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 140 lb64 kg |
| Sail area | 175 ft²16.3 m² | 202 ft²18.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 30.04 | 21.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 66 | 138 |
| Comfort ratio | 6.3 | 7.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.59 | 3.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Bay Hen 21 vs Hunter 212: the short version
- The Bay Hen 21 and Hunter 212 are close in length (21.0 ft6.40 m vs 21.0 ft6.40 m ).
- The Hunter 212 is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bay Hen 21 carries the more powerful rig (30.0 vs 21.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 212 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bay Hen 21 rates better for offshore work (2.59 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.