Bayfield 25 vs Bayfield 36
How do the Bayfield 25 and Bayfield 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 25 
Bayfield 36 | Bayfield 25 | Bayfield 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 18,500 lb8,391 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 764 ft²71.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.06 | 17.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 291 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 32.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 7.4 |
Bayfield 25 vs Bayfield 36: the short version
- The Bayfield 36 is the larger boat at 36.0 ft10.97 m LOA versus 25.0 ft7.62 m for the Bayfield 25.
- The Bayfield 36 is heavier, displacing about 429% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bayfield 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bayfield 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bayfield 36 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.