Bayfield 25 vs Bayfield 40
How do the Bayfield 25 and Bayfield 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 25 
Bayfield 40 | Bayfield 25 | Bayfield 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 39.5 ft12.04 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 21,000 lb9,525 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 8,200 lb3,719 kg |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 794 ft²73.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.06 | 16.69 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 330 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 35.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 1.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 7.4 |
Bayfield 25 vs Bayfield 40: the short version
- The Bayfield 40 is the larger boat at 39.5 ft12.04 m LOA versus 25.0 ft7.62 m for the Bayfield 25.
- The Bayfield 40 is heavier, displacing about 500% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bayfield 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bayfield 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bayfield 40 rates better for offshore work (1.74 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.