Bayfield 25 vs Folkboat
How do the Bayfield 25 and Folkboat compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 25 
Folkboat | Bayfield 25 | Folkboat | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 25.1 ft7.64 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 4,740 lb2,150 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 2,260 lb1,025 kg |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 258 ft²24.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.06 | 14.63 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 277 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €3,000 |
Bayfield 25 vs Folkboat: the short version
- The Bayfield 25 and Folkboat are close in length (25.0 ft7.62 m vs 25.1 ft7.64 m ).
- The Folkboat is heavier, displacing about 35% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bayfield 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 14.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Folkboat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Folkboat rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.