Bayfield 25 vs Jouët 760
How do the Bayfield 25 and Jouët 760 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 25 
Jouët 760 | Bayfield 25 | Jouët 760 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 277 ft²25.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.06 | 15.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 223 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 17.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.2 |
Bayfield 25 vs Jouët 760: the short version
- The Bayfield 25 and Jouët 760 are close in length (25.0 ft7.62 m vs 24.9 ft7.60 m ).
- The Jouët 760 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bayfield 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Jouët 760 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bayfield 25 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.