Bayfield 25 vs Kelt 7.6
How do the Bayfield 25 and Kelt 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 25 
Kelt 7.6 | Bayfield 25 | Kelt 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.0 ft7.62 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.4 ft2.88 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 4,188 lb1,900 kg |
| Ballast | 1,300 lb590 kg | 1,631 lb740 kg |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 273 ft²25.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.06 | 16.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.1 |
Bayfield 25 vs Kelt 7.6: the short version
- The Bayfield 25 and Kelt 7.6 are close in length (25.0 ft7.62 m vs 24.9 ft7.60 m ).
- The Kelt 7.6 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bayfield 25 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bayfield 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bayfield 25 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.