Bayfield 29 vs Island Packet 29
How do the Bayfield 29 and Island Packet 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bayfield 29 | Bayfield 29 | Island Packet 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.0 ft8.84 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Waterline length | 21.8 ft6.63 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 10.8 ft3.30 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 7,100 lb3,221 kg | 10,900 lb4,944 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Sail area | 420 ft²39.0 m² | 491 ft²45.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.19 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 308 | 291 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.9 | 26.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.12 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.8 |
Bayfield 29 vs Island Packet 29: the short version
- The Bayfield 29 and Island Packet 29 are close in length (29.0 ft8.84 m vs 29.0 ft8.84 m ).
- The Island Packet 29 is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bayfield 29 carries the more powerful rig (18.2 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Island Packet 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Island Packet 29 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.