BB 10 vs Beneteau 323
How do the BB 10 and Beneteau 323 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
BB 10 
Beneteau 323 | BB 10 | Beneteau 323 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.00 m | 32.8 ft10.01 m |
| Waterline length | 23.9 ft7.29 m | 29.2 ft8.89 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 10.8 ft3.28 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.46 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 4,956 lb2,248 kg | 9,325 lb4,230 kg |
| Ballast | 2,700 lb1,225 kg | 2,414 lb1,095 kg |
| Sail area | 358 ft²33.3 m² | 542 ft²50.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.71 | 19.57 |
| Displacement / Length | 162 | 168 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.5 | 20.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.2 |
BB 10 vs Beneteau 323: the short version
- The BB 10 and Beneteau 323 are close in length (32.8 ft10.00 m vs 32.8 ft10.01 m ).
- The Beneteau 323 is heavier, displacing about 88% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the BB 10 carries the more powerful rig (19.7 vs 19.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 323 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the BB 10 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.