Beachcomber 25 vs Northern 25
How do the Beachcomber 25 and Northern 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beachcomber 25 
Northern 25 | Beachcomber 25 | Northern 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.72 m | 25.3 ft7.70 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 19.3 ft5.87 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 5,100 lb2,313 kg |
| Ballast | 1,600 lb726 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Sail area | 275 ft²25.5 m² | 304 ft²28.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.66 | 16.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 191 | 319 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.2 | 22.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 5.9 |
Beachcomber 25 vs Northern 25: the short version
- The Beachcomber 25 and Northern 25 are close in length (25.3 ft7.72 m vs 25.3 ft7.70 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Northern 25 carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Northern 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beachcomber 25 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 1.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.