Becker 27 vs Cal 3-27
How do the Becker 27 and Cal 3-27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Becker 27 | Becker 27 | Cal 3-27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.6 ft8.12 m | 26.7 ft8.13 m |
| Waterline length | 21.2 ft6.45 m | 23.3 ft7.09 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 5,200 lb2,359 kg |
| Ballast | 2,205 lb1,000 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 301 ft²28.0 m² | 336 ft²31.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.81 | 17.91 |
| Displacement / Length | 229 | 185 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.6 | 17.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.12 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €3,400 | — |
Becker 27 vs Cal 3-27: the short version
- The Becker 27 and Cal 3-27 are close in length (26.6 ft8.12 m vs 26.7 ft8.13 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 3-27 carries the more powerful rig (17.9 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 3-27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 3-27 rates better for offshore work (2.08 vs 2.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.