Becker 27 vs Niagara 26
How do the Becker 27 and Niagara 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Becker 27 
Niagara 26 | Becker 27 | Niagara 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.6 ft8.12 m | 26.7 ft8.13 m |
| Waterline length | 21.2 ft6.45 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 4.4 ft1.35 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Ballast | 2,205 lb1,000 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Sail area | 301 ft²28.0 m² | 316 ft²29.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.81 | 20.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 229 | 147 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.6 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.12 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €3,400 | — |
Becker 27 vs Niagara 26: the short version
- The Becker 27 and Niagara 26 are close in length (26.6 ft8.12 m vs 26.7 ft8.13 m ).
- The Becker 27 is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Niagara 26 carries the more powerful rig (20.1 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Becker 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Niagara 26 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.