Beetle Cat vs Swing
How do the Beetle Cat and Swing compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beetle Cat 
Swing | Beetle Cat | Swing | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.3 ft3.76 m | 12.4 ft3.78 m |
| Waterline length | 11.7 ft3.56 m | —— |
| Beam | 6.1 ft1.85 m | 2.2 ft0.68 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | —— |
| Displacement | 450 lb204 kg | 40 lb18 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 140 ft²13.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 38.15 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 126 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 5.3 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.17 | 2.61 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.6 | — |
Beetle Cat vs Swing: the short version
- The Beetle Cat and Swing are close in length (12.3 ft3.76 m vs 12.4 ft3.78 m ).
- The Beetle Cat is heavier, displacing about 1025% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swing rates better for offshore work (2.61 vs 3.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.