Beneteau 31 vs Beneteau Figaro 2
How do the Beneteau 31 and Beneteau Figaro 2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 31 
Beneteau Figaro 2 | Beneteau 31 | Beneteau Figaro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.7 ft9.65 m | 33.3 ft10.15 m |
| Waterline length | 28.5 ft8.69 m | 32.1 ft9.80 m |
| Beam | 11.1 ft3.38 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 8,933 lb4,052 kg | 6,680 lb3,030 kg |
| Ballast | 2,207 lb1,001 kg | 2,447 lb1,110 kg |
| Sail area | 461 ft²42.8 m² | 792 ft²73.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.13 | 35.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.0 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.39 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.6 |
Beneteau 31 vs Beneteau Figaro 2: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 2 is the larger boat at 33.3 ft10.15 m LOA versus 31.7 ft9.65 m for the Beneteau 31.
- The Beneteau 31 is heavier, displacing about 34% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 2 carries the more powerful rig (35.7 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 31 rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.