Beneteau 31 vs Beneteau Figaro 3
How do the Beneteau 31 and Beneteau Figaro 3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Beneteau 31 
Beneteau Figaro 3 | Beneteau 31 | Beneteau Figaro 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.7 ft9.65 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 28.5 ft8.69 m | 31.0 ft9.46 m |
| Beam | 11.1 ft3.38 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Displacement | 8,933 lb4,052 kg | 6,393 lb2,900 kg |
| Ballast | 2,207 lb1,001 kg | 2,449 lb1,111 kg |
| Sail area | 461 ft²42.8 m² | 753 ft²70.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.13 | 34.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 95 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.0 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.14 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.5 |
Beneteau 31 vs Beneteau Figaro 3: the short version
- The Beneteau Figaro 3 is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.89 m LOA versus 31.7 ft9.65 m for the Beneteau 31.
- The Beneteau 31 is heavier, displacing about 40% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau Figaro 3 carries the more powerful rig (35.0 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 31 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 31 rates better for offshore work (2.14 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.