Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau 331
How do the Beneteau 323 and Beneteau 331 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Beneteau 323 | Beneteau 331 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.8 ft10.01 m | 33.9 ft10.34 m |
| Waterline length | 29.2 ft8.89 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.28 m | 11.3 ft3.45 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.45 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 9,325 lb4,230 kg | 11,173 lb5,068 kg |
| Ballast | 2,414 lb1,095 kg | 3,253 lb1,476 kg |
| Sail area | 542 ft²50.4 m² | 500 ft²46.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.57 | 16.01 |
| Displacement / Length | 168 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.1 | 21.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.4 |
Beneteau 323 vs Beneteau 331: the short version
- The Beneteau 331 is the larger boat at 33.9 ft10.34 m LOA versus 32.8 ft10.01 m for the Beneteau 323.
- The Beneteau 331 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beneteau 323 carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau 331 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau 331 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Beneteau 323
Beneteau 331